Courses

Last Modified : November 19, 2009, at 03:14 PM

Journal Club

(redirected from Main.Research)

Fall 2009 meeting time is: Thur 10:30am-12:30am, 2169 BI. The papers we read are either at: Djvu, papers or auditorymodels.org.

2009 Schedule

DatePresenterPaper Abrev TitleAuthor (year)FMTPresentation
MM/DD/09NameAbrev TitleAuthor (year)djvudoc
      
ASSPRogerBasilar Membrane Responses to Noise at a Basal Site of the Chinchilla Cochlea: Quasi-Linear FilteringRuggero EtAl (2009)djvu 
TBDAnjali+WoojaePhonological Universals, UIUC Presentation Nov 5, 2009Ohala (2009)ppt 
12/?/09Anjali+WoojaeAbsorption of reliable spectral characteristics in auditory perceptionKiefte & Kluender (2008)pdf 
12/?/09OHC BasicsPower Efficiency of Outer Hair Cell Somatic ElectromotilityRabbittEtAl09
djvu 
12/?/09AndreaModulation processing in the ICNelson+Carney (2007)
djvu 
12/?/09Riya+RogerAllen–Fahey and related exp's support predominance of cochlear slow-wave emissions
SheraEtAl07.pdfpdf 
12/?/09AndreaFast motile resp OHC: Cellular basis of the CAAshmore (1987)djvu 
11/?/09Andrea+Jont3D model of current flow in a cochlear model and the mechanism of the CAAshmore (2009)
pdf 
11/?/09RiyaMasking growth in HI earsNelson & Schroder (1997)
djvu 
11/?/09AndreaCochlear and neural modelHeinz et al (2001)
djvuRepeat 9/17/09
11/?/09BobGreenberg 1998: Speaking in shorthand: ...Greenberg (1998)
djvu 
11/5/09Chong+Riya+FeipengLoudness its definition, interpretation and calculationFletcher+Munson (1933)
djvu 
10/29/09/ChongAI frequency importance functionsDuggirala etal (1988)
djvu 
10/22/09Riya+RogerThe Auditory Masking of One Pure Tone by Another and
Its Probable Relation to the Dynamics of the Inner Ear
Wegel+Lane (1924)
djvu 
TBDFeipengTime-Warp–Invariant Neuronal ProcessingGütig1, Sompolinsky (2009)PLoS 
10/15/09Andrea+Roger"Speech Recognition in Noise: Est. Effects of Compressive BM NL,"Dubno etal(2007)
djvu 
10/15/09Andrea+Jont+Riya"Basilar Membrane Nonlinearity and Its Influence on AN Rate-intensity Functions"G. Yates
djvu 
      
ASAPAbhinauvCue-enhancement and intelligibility of nonsense material in noiseHazan, Simpson (1987)pdf 
      
ASAPTBDDelgutte V: Vowles in noiseDelgutte+Kiang (1984)
djvu 
ASAPTBDDelgutte IV: Dynamic ConsonantsDelgutte+Kiang (1984)
djvu 
11/5/2009BobDelgutte III: Voiceless FricativesDelgutte+Kiang (1984)
djvu 
ASAPTBDDelgutte II: Processing schemes for VowelsDelgutte+Kiang (1984)
djvu 
ASAPTBDDelgutte I: VowelsDelgutte+Kiang (1984)
djvu 
      
ASAPTBDGreenberg IV:Ear-club presentation(2007)
ppt 
ASAPFeipeng+WoojaeGreenberg III: Multi-Tier Theory(2006)
djvu 
ASAPTBDGreenberg+Arai II: What are the Essential cues for understanding Spoken Language?(2006)
djvu 
ASAPFeipeng+BobGreenberg+Arai I: Speech and Modulation(2001)
djvu 
      
ASAPKramerDau V: Envelope Modulation processing and spectral masking
Dau+Derleth (2000a)djvu 
ASAPTBDDau IV: NB noise modulation detection(1999b)djvu 
ASAPRiyaDau III: CMR and modulation filterbank(1999a)djvu 
      
DatePresenterPaper Abrev TitleFormatPresentation
10/15/09Roger+AndreaDelgutte I: VowelsDelgutte+Kiang (1984) djvuDelgutteKiang84I 
9/27/09Mike KramerA quantitatve model of signal processing in the auditory system; Dau & Puschell (I, II) (1996)
I, II9/27/09
9/24/09Feipeng+JontCochlear and neural modelHeinz (2009) Zliany&Bruce (2006)9/25
9/17/09Andrea+Roger+JontReview: Outer Hair Cell Motility
Ashmore.08Need more
9/10/9/Anjali RiyaPredicting consonant confusions ...
Dubno & Levitt 81done?
9/3/9Woojae & BobSpeech recognition threshold in noise: Effects of hearing loss, frequency response, and speech materials
Van Tasell DJ & Yanz JL (1987) 
8/27/09Riya, FeipengSpeech and envelope cues
VanTasell, Soli, Kerby Widen (1987) 
8/20/09JontThe Modulation Transfer Function for Speech Intelligibility
Plos+audio, Elliot+Theunissn (2009) 
8/6/09WoojaeSpeech perception in gated noiseLee & Kewley-Port (2009) 
7/23/09Feipeng & RogerMasking release in CI speech processing
N. Li and Loizou (2009)LiLoizou09
7/16/09Riya and Woojaenew HI data analysis -
7/2/09Feipeng
A novel signal-processing strategy for hearing-aid design: neurocompensation
Bondi et al (2004)BondiEtAl04?
7/2/09Roger
Cochlear macromechanics: Time domain solutions
Allen & Sondhi (1979)AllenSondhi79
6/25/09BobPhoneme restorationBaskent, Edwards (2009)-
6/18/09Roger
A Bio-Inspired Active Radio-Frequency Silicon Cochlea: 1) This shows why the cochlear spectrum analysis algorithm is O(N) vs. O(NlogN) in an FFT or vs. O(N2) in an analog filter bank, making it the fastest spectrum analysis algorithm known, 2) and gives the first-principles method on how to make rational discrete-transmission-lines have sharp-rolloff slopes with low group delay, similar to the biological cochlea.Sarpeshkar et al (2009)-
6/11/09AnjaliInformation entropy of humpback whale songs
Suzuki, Buck, Tyack (2006)-
6/4/09WoojaeRelations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearingStrelcyk & Dau (2009)-
5/27/09AllRecent concepts and challenges in hearing researchDau (2009) (ppt)-
5/20/09AbhinauvStop consonant discrimination based on human auditionSearle et al (1979)-
5/20/09RogerFactors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds (continued)French & Steinberg (1947)-
5/13/09 No meeting - final exams -
5/6/09Andrea, FeipengA pulse ribbon model of monaural phase perceptionPatterson (1987)-
4/29/09RogerFactors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech SoundsFrench & Steinberg (1947)-
4/27/09WoojaeComparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.Dubno & Schaefer (1992)-
4/15/09TBDA signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res 29:146-154Plomp R (1986)-
4/8/09WoojaeCortical evoked potentials using naturally produced speech soundsTremblay et al (2003)slice Δ
4/1/09FeipengTemporal Features of Speech in the Auditory System: Normal and Dyslexic Children and an Animal ModelAbrams PhD Thesis (2008)-
3/18/09RiyaThe effects of high presentation levels on consonant feature transmissionHornsby et al (2005)-
3/11/09Riya, Abhinauv, & AnjaliConsonant confusions in patients with sensorineural hearing loss Bilger & Wang (1976)Summary Part 2
3/4/09LenSHS presentation practice (Allen & Li away at AAS 2009)--
2/25/09Woojae, Len, & MichaelANOVA analysis; SINFA--
2/18/09Riya, Abhinauv, & AnjaliConsonant confusions in patients with sensorineural hearing loss Bilger & Wang (1976)Summary Part 1
2/11/09TBDConsonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual featuresWang & Bilger (1973), Bilger & Wang (1973)-
2/4/09Woojae & Anjali, with help from Jont & FeipengSimulating hearing impaired ears with the addition of masking noiseZurek & Delhorne (1987)-
1/27/09Woojae & Anjali, with help from Jont & FeipengSimulating hearing impaired ears with the addition of masking noiseZurek & Delhorne (1987)-
1/22/09Roger, Andrea, & JontWiener-kernel analysis of basilar-membrane responses to noise in the chinchilla cochleaRecio-Spinoso, Narayan, Ruggero (2008)-

Journal Club Archives

Journal Club Schedule 2008

Papers on Hold


  • Papers on: speech perception, feature extraction, event detection, psychophysics, cochlear modeling, etc., by authors including Dubno, Kamm, Greenberg, Alwan, Grant, Heil, Delgutte, Shera, Neely, ...
  • Reading List:
  • Rhode JASA papers on the cochlea
  • NL cochlear modeling document by JBA
  • Dead Regions in the Cochlea Moore (2001)

kapok Archives

Suggestions From Judy

Sandeep and Jont,
Here are four papers related to the SRT that might be useful:

  • Plomp (1986) reported SRT values for low-pass filtered speech (his Fig 7), which demonstrates the relationship between the SRT and speech bandwidth. Similar results were reported in the original paper describing the HINT (Nilsson et al., 1994).
  • Van Tasell and Yanz (1987) shows a strong relation between SRT and high-frequency hearing using spectrally shaped speech.
  • Results of Smoorenburg (1992) show a strong relation between SRT and thresholds at 2.0 and 4.0 kHz with a large sample size.

References:

  • Nilsson M, Soli S, Sullivan JA (1994) Development of the Hearing In Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 95:1085-1099.
  • Plomp R (1986) A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res 29:146-154.
  • Smoorenburg GF (1992) Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram. J Acoust Soc Am 91:421-437.
  • Van Tasell DJ, Yanz JL (1987). Speech recognition threshold in noise: Effects of hearing loss, frequency response, and speech materials. J Speech Hear Res 30:377-386.

Best of luck,
Judy